Smith discusses various formulations of the non-aggression principle and concludes with some remarks about the problem of pollution.
Smith presents the rudiments of a theory of children’s rights.
Smith criticizes Zwolinski’s discussions of risk, fraud, and the relationship between aggression and property rights.
Smith examines the argument that minor acts of aggression are morally permissible if they result in good consequences that offset an unjust act.
Smith examines the claim that the non-aggression principle should be viewed as a defeasible presumption.
Smith explains why Mises predicted that “planned chaos” would emerge in a socialist economy and how F.A. Hayek elaborated on that insight.
Smith discusses the theory of value that provided the foundation for the Misesian argument that rational economic calculation is impossible in a socialistic economy.
Smith explores some of the traditional biblical arguments for and against religious persecution.
Smith discusses Acton’s thesis that the conflict between church and state in medieval Europe was vital to the progress of freedom.
Smith discusses some common criticisms of Lord Acton and other classical liberal historians.
Smith discusses some of Lord Acton’s ideas about freedom and their relevance to the modern libertarian movement.
John Locke argues for liberty of conscience which he calls “every man’s natural right,” in this selection from A Letter Concerning Toleration.
Smith explores some theoretical aspects of a rights-based conception of freedom.
Smith discusses a metaphor that was widely used by early libertarian writers who defended the natural equality of humankind.
Smith discusses the crucial distinction between political obligation and political allegiance, and how the problem of allegiance was the major concern of John Locke.
Smith broadens his discussion of a rights-based theory of freedom with an overview of modern political philosophy.
Smith considers the different conceptions of freedom defended by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.
How much say should the political process have over what we can freely buy and sell?
Smith interrupts his usual series with a 30-question trivia quiz.
Smith discusses his ideas about “strategic Taoism.”
Smith discusses some of the problems in libertarian theory caused by the many different conceptions of liberty.
Smith criticizes Jason Brennan’s defense of positive liberty and his attempt to make positive liberty an essential part of libertarian theory.
Instead of a Review: A Commentary on Libertarianism: What Everyone Needs to Know, by Jason Brennan, Part 2
Smith criticizes Jason Brennan’s view of the origin of “hard libertarianism” and his treatment of Ayn Rand.
Smith begins his critical examination of Jason Brennan’s recent book with a discussion of the label “libertarianism” and its relationship to classical liberalism.