The modern state is a contingent historical development, born in blood—not a permanent or inevitable feature of human society.
One Year After Charlottesville’s “Unite The Right” Riots: Following Karl Popper, We Should Tolerate Intolerance, Within Reason
Contra Popper’s virally optimized doppelgangers, the paradox of tolerance demands forbearance and restraint.
The annual event throws the differences between libertarian and conservative thinking into sharp relief.
Smith discusses the interesting case of James Birney, who freed his slaves and became a prominent abolitionist.
Anxiety about fake news has long dogged open publishing environs, while the costs of gatekeeping often go unnoticed.
Criticizing smart contracts for not being completely “trustless” instruments completely misses the point.
Pining for a golden age of liberty that never existed is analytically and rhetorically disastrous.
It may be doing more harm than good.
Smith explains the crucial role of rights in political theory.
Smith discusses the common argument that natural rights will lead inevitably to anarchism.
Smith continues his brief discussion of how to justify natural rights.
America may be increasingly polarized—but the split is cultural, not ideological.
In the debate over net neutrality, we need to pay closer attention to the anti-competitive interests of Internet Content Providers.
Smith interrupts his series on abolitionism to present a barebones defense of natural rights.
Presley discusses Albert Camus’s essay “Neither Victims nor Executioners.”
Smith discusses some circumstances that led to the formation of the abolitionist Liberty Party in 1840.
The New York Times editorial board has it all wrong.
Kuznicki draws a parallel between the “God of the Gaps” fallacy and how some people justify the state.