Smith begins his explanation of why so many abolitionists joined the crusade for the legal prohibition of alcohol.
George H. Smith
George H. Smith was formerly Senior Research Fellow for the Institute for Humane Studies, a lecturer on American History for Cato Summer Seminars, and Executive Editor of Knowledge Products. Smith's fourth and most recent book, The System of Liberty, was published by Cambridge University Press in 2013.
Smith concludes his discussion of the no-voting theory of Wendell Phillips by explaining Phillips’s attitude toward taxes and the limits of democracy.
Smith discusses how William Lloyd Garrison and Wendell Phillips differed in their approaches to non-voting.
Smith discusses some similarities between the anti-political abolitionists and contemporary voluntaryists.
Smith continues his discussion of the arguments in Can Abolitionists Vote or Take Office under the United States Constitution?
Smith discusses the arguments of Wendell Phillips that abolitionists should not vote or hold political office.
Smith discusses the prevalence of violence against abolitionists during the 1830s, and how Wendell Phillips became an abolitionist.
Smith discusses the split in the American Anti-Slavery Society over voting, equal rights for women, and other causes.
Smith discusses the controversy over whether the U.S. Constitution is pro-slavery, as illustrated in the opposing views of two leading abolitionists: Wendell Phillips and Lysander Spooner.
Smith discusses the crucial role played by the inalienable right of self-ownership in the abolitionist crusade to abolish slavery.
Smith discusses some elements of credibility and offers advice on how to engage in arguments.
Smith discusses some common problems encountered by libertarians when they defend their political beliefs in arguments.
Smith explores the indispensable role of value commitments in our quest for knowledge.
Smith discusses the crucial difference between science and philosophy, and how human fallibility has been used to defend skepticism.
Smith discusses the inevitability of holding some false beliefs and what can be done to minimize this problem.
Smith discusses the claim that some beliefs are immoral and the role of credibility in choosing our beliefs.
Smith discusses various meanings of “belief” and “doubt.”
Smith criticizes the argument of W.K. Clifford that we have a duty to mankind to base our beliefs on the best available evidence.