Libertarians should support open borders, with possible exceptions for the exclusion of convicted criminals and people carrying disease.
Smith explores Emile Durkheim’s major objections to Herbert Spencer’s theory of a free society based on voluntary contracts.
Babcock examines how Hayekian insights can guide feminist reform efforts.
Blanks says that disregard for civil rights and police abuse continue to undermine the social fabric in black communities, despite hard-won formal legal equality.
Babcock examines a concrete case of the conflict between Hayek and rationalism: feminism.
What’s the libertarian lesson of the “ice bucket challenge?” Trust people to direct their charitable donations, even though they might make poor decisions.
Smith explores some features of social holism, as explained and defended by Emile Durkheim.
Hayek’s insights are important for building a sucessful rationalist ethics.
Smith explores the historical and theoretical roots of methodological individualism and subjectivism.
Babcock offers advice on how to best apply Hayekian ideas to debates about social reform.
Smith discusses some controversial features of praxeology, as defended by Ludwig von Mises.
It’s often thought that Hayek disproved the possibility of a rationalist ethics. Babcock argues he didn’t.
Smith explains methodological individualism and its implications for the existence of institutions and other social phenomena.
How much should we trust our moral intuitions? Is the task of ethics to describe those intuitions, or to change them?
Some of the libertarian gender gap can be attributed to sociological factors, but substantive policy disagreements must not be dismissed.
Smith discusses the value of sociology and some misconceptions of methodological individualism.
What’s a libertarian? This essay explores some attempts at delineating the borders of libertarianism, especially attempts using beliefs about morality and the law.