This week we discuss the implications of law enforecement’s ability to access genetic information from DNA databases like Ancestry and 23&Me.
Michael Douma joins us for the first part of a two-part series to discuss how we should see the past as as an interpretative history.
Matthew Larosiere joins us to discuss how his interest in the design and development of weapons is controversial.
Phil Haunschild joins us to discuss how blockchain technology could potentially eliminate the governments’ presence in welfare and charity.
Timothy Sandefur joins us this week to discuss how Frederick Douglass does not align perfectly into the accepted political factions of today.
Adam Bates joins us this week to talk about how the Muslim ban inspired him to change his work focus from criminal justice to refugee relief.
Mark McDaniel joins us to discuss homemade gun technology in response to a recent court case involving gun ownership activist, Cody Wilson.
1848 changed American politics forever, and early Libertarianism was at the center of it.
Jeff Vanderslice & Matt Weibel join us today to discuss the inner workings of Congress.
Mike Masnick of Techdirt joins the show to discuss how the European Union’s hamfisted efforts to enforce digital copyright could undermine open internet.
George Smith discusses Kant’s attempt to justify objective moral principles and his views on when the use of coercion is morally proper.
Martin Van Buren was intellectually committed to laissez-faire and limited government, but the devil is always in the details.
Thomas Hazlett joins us for a discussion on the history of the U.S. government’s regulation of the airways.
This week, we talk about smart televisions watching you, the Brave browser, and the life of Twitch streamer Ice Poseidon.
George Smith explains some fundamental features of Immanuel Kant’s moral and political theory.
The Polk years began in a sort of uneasy truce between radicals and conservatives.
Sebastian Edwards joins us today to discuss why we abandoned the gold standard.
Kate Sills joins to respond to several recent articles criticizing smart contracts, including the “Oracle problem.”