Smith explains why Burke predicted that the French Revolution would end in systematic violence.
George H. Smith
George H. Smith was formerly Senior Research Fellow for the Institute for Humane Studies, a lecturer on American History for Cato Summer Seminars, and Executive Editor of Knowledge Products. Smith's fourth and most recent book, The System of Liberty, was published by Cambridge University Press in 2013.
Smith explains the defense of rights and other abstract political principles given by James Mackintosh, one of Burke’s most effective critics.
Smith explains why Edmund Burke opposed abstract rights and why James Mackintosh defended them.
Smith concludes this series with more observations about James Mackintosh’s defense of natural rights.
Smith discusses some background of the debate between Paine and Burke, and the furor created by Paine’s Rights of Man.
In 1792, Thomas Paine was tried for seditious libel. In this essay, George H. Smith discusses the prosecution’s case.
Smith discusses Thomas Erskine’s ideas on libel laws and freedom of the press, and how he incorporated those ideas during his defense of Thomas Paine.
Smith discusses Thomas Paine’s theory of rights.
Smith continues his discussion of Thomas Paine’s theory of rights and government.
How the libertarian ideas of Richard Price motivated Burke to write Reflections on the Revolution in France, and how Paine dealt with the controversy.
Smith explains Paine’s constitutional theory and why he believed that Britain had no constitution.
Smith explains some of Paine’s ideas about the nature of a republic and the benefits of a representative form of government.
The ideal of individual freedom is more than a will-o’-the-wisp. It was widely appreciated in the past and so may become widely appreciated in the future.
Smith explains Paine’s views on paper money, price controls, self-interest, and exploitative governments.
Smith discusses Paine’s welfare proposals in Rights of Man and Agrarian Justice.
Smith explains methodological subjectivism and how it applies to the study of human action.
George H. Smith distinguishes “tolerating” religious difference from recognizing a genuine right to religious freedom.
Smith explains how the methodological monism of modern positivism differs from classical empiricism.